egghelp/eggheads community

ban mask

2012-03-31T05:25:05-04:00

After a few playing around with trial and error I have came to this:
from the original:

Code:

2 {return *!*[lindex [split [maskhost $uhost] "!"] 1]}

to:

Code:

2 {return *![lindex [split [maskhost $uhost] "!"] 1]}

Perhaps it is not the most sophisticate solution, but it work for now till there is better one. Since I don't have any TCL code experience it is some kind of success.
Thanks again for the effort.
Best. Arvent.

Statistics: Posted by arvent — Sat Mar 31, 2012 5:25 am

Re: ban mask

2012-03-30T05:34:10-04:00

You are correct about the eggdrop version. I am using 1.6.21.
The ban mask change with the new line to: *!*ident@machine.domain.com as it is in sl_masktype 1.
Thanks for your replay and efforts.
Best

Statistics: Posted by arvent — Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:34 am

Re: ban mask

2012-03-29T19:38:40-04:00

I have set it with set sl_masktype 2 in order to get this ban mask: *!*ident@*.domain.com, but instead get the: *!**ident@*.domain.com.
Am I doing something wrong and the most important what can I do to fix it?

Looks as though an argument was added to the masktype command in eggdrop 1.6.20 allowing selection of a hostmask type, but the new default type is different from what the command would've returned prior to 1.6.20, which can break compatibility with scripts that expect it to behave as documented in 1.6.19 and earlier.

A small change to line 1155 (for the sentinel.tcl included with netbots.tcl v4.10) will probably fix it:

Replace:

Code:

    2 {return *!*[lindex [split [maskhost $uhost] "!"] 1]}

With:

Code:

    2 {return *!*[lindex [split [maskhost $uhost 0] "!"] 1]}

Statistics: Posted by slennox — Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:38 pm

ban mask

2012-03-28T14:14:11-04:00

Hii. I use netbots.tcl v4.10. When sentinel get someone banned it get double * in front of the inent.
I have set it with set sl_masktype 2 in order to get this ban mask: *!*ident@*.domain.com, but instead get the: *!**ident@*.domain.com.
Am I doing something wrong and the most important what can I do to fix it?
Thanks in advance.
P.S.
Great work with the scripts. Brings much joy and safety.
Chears.

Statistics: Posted by arvent — Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:14 pm

Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1

2005-02-16T23:33:48-04:00

Sorry test2 version is working great. thank you to slennox

Statistics: Posted by mm — Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:33 pm

Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1

2005-02-16T01:51:42-04:00

with a bit teaking I got this test version running as standalone. you just need the settings from netset.tcl and the procs nb_sendcmd and nb_killutimer (i have bitchx simul disabled ) from netbot.tcl.

PS: beat me, if I missed any change I made .

PPS: I changed the locktime setting to this

Code:

if { $network == "QuakeNet" } {set sl_locktimes {i:30 m:30 r:300}} elseif { $network == "euIRCnet" } {set sl_locktimes {i:30 m:30 R:300}} else {set sl_locktimes {i:120 m:30}}

probably only intresting when 2 bots running on diffrent networks are running on same directory. But maybe you consider using the "only regististred" Mode in flood cases, this mode will block most multi-host spamer and leave the channel free for kind registred chatters .

Statistics: Posted by De Kus — Wed Feb 16, 2005 1:51 am

Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1

2005-02-15T23:14:13-04:00

Yeah, well i've upload the test2 with the following setting

set sl_locktimes {i:30 m:60 r:60}
set sl_txflood 6:15
set sl_txlength 180
set sl_nclength 1
set sl_linecap 50:15

then i have used few clone ip's to test this using control char, bold etc, but it didn't trigger at all..
when i do .sentinel i can see the setting is there

Statistics: Posted by mm — Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:14 pm

Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1

2005-02-15T08:08:58-04:00

There are two rules. First, the minimum locktime for any mode is 30 seconds. Second, modes +i and +m must be included.

I guess you can't remove +i and +m.

Statistics: Posted by Sir_Fz — Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:08 am

Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1

2005-02-15T07:05:18-04:00

Yes, that should work fine.

Statistics: Posted by Alchera — Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:05 am

Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1

2005-02-14T21:47:32-04:00

Hi, how the setting will work for undernet, since undernet has mode +r and may be doesn't need +i
so should i set
set sl_locktimes {r:120 m:60}?

thanks

Statistics: Posted by mm — Mon Feb 14, 2005 9:47 pm

Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1

2005-02-14T10:23:50-04:00

Edit: I realised , Does this require netbots to work?

Oh, very much so.

Statistics: Posted by Alchera — Mon Feb 14, 2005 10:23 am

Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1

2005-02-14T08:37:23-04:00

I am running eggdrop v1.6.18+morecopyrights and have loaded the test2 file and this is wat the error it shows

Code:

 [16:38] can't read "sl_bxsimul": no such variable     while executing "if {$sl_bxsimul} {   bind raw - 001 sl_bxserverjoin   if {![info exists sl_bxonestack]} {     set sl_bxonestack 0   }   if {![info exists sl_bxversion..."     (file "scripts/sentinel.tcl" line 1115)     invoked from within "source scripts/sentinel.tcl"     (file "eggdrop.conf" line 1371)

Edit: I realised , Does this require netbots to work?

Statistics: Posted by Vixs — Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:37 am

Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1

2005-01-23T23:29:38-04:00

I've been using Test2 version of sentinel and am pleased with its' performance. So far, with a number of attempts to text flood a number of channels I have bots in, it's performed as expected. In one channel (which I am actually sitting in to watch) last night 6 flood bots entered and only managed to get a total of 12 lines in before the channel locking kicked in; bearing in mind that I have yet to still "play" with the sl_txlength setting.

Statistics: Posted by Alchera — Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:29 pm

Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1

2005-01-23T21:11:54-04:00

Oh a new final version of sentinel is finally out! after waiting a long interval of 3 years

Statistics: Posted by awyeah — Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:11 pm

Test version of sentinel.tcl v4.09.1

2005-01-20T06:41:39-04:00

Test2 is now available. This adds some text and notice flood detection in a way that was relatively simple to implement--as part of an amalgamated text/notice/tsunami/avalanche mechanism. Please refer to the section at the top of the test script for more information.

Statistics: Posted by slennox — Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:41 am