egghelp/eggheads community

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-24T16:29:00-04:00

/me *nods*

It wuz just a suggestion to eggdev btw. Instead of them starting over with all new 'products'

Statistics: Posted by Yourname — Thu Jan 24, 2002 4:29 pm

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-24T13:26:00-04:00

The eggdev coders in question, as busy working away on coding 1.7, which is better than fixing eggdrop to work on broken products.

Statistics: Posted by ppslim — Thu Jan 24, 2002 1:26 pm

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-24T11:42:00-04:00

Instead of modifying eggdrop for the sake of new, up-coming IRCds, why can't a department or a section of the eggdev make small patches for those IRCds that are a bit known and famous? ..Not that you should make a patch for every other new IRCd being made.

But then, as i think, its really not good if support for new networks such as these should be hardcoded into the stable eggdrops; which may lead to more problems/errors.

Pathches will look good

Statistics: Posted by Yourname — Thu Jan 24, 2002 11:42 am

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-22T02:19:00-04:00

On 2002-01-21 23:00, Wcc wrote:
/who works fine in bahamut 1.4.30 (and the cvs versions). He must have changed it himself.

yeah, but VIRCD it's older than bahamut 1.4.30

I think it's basead on a older release.

Statistics: Posted by Guest — Tue Jan 22, 2002 2:19 am

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-22T02:00:00-04:00

/who works fine in bahamut 1.4.30 (and the cvs versions). He must have changed it himself.

Statistics: Posted by Wcc — Tue Jan 22, 2002 2:00 am

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-22T00:30:00-04:00

right... the ircd it's called VIRCD, and it's a brazilian modified version of Bahamut 1.4.x

I think it's a problem of bahamut's ircd, becose I don't belive that he would change the /who parameters for his own.

If anyone want's to talk with VIRCD's creator, the website is http://www.ircd.com.br/

But the question now is: where of the eggdrop code is the /WHO comando procedure ?

Statistics: Posted by Guest — Tue Jan 22, 2002 12:30 am

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-21T16:36:00-04:00

Yes guppy, I agree. Adding channel modes is still OK, because it doesn't really break anything (unless they modify the way the RFC's modes work), but this messing around with /who does cause problems not only with eggdrop. Like Wcc says... I have trouble with mIRC's IAL because I have a scripted /who on join to fill the IAL, which does not work on most non-compliant ircds.

Statistics: Posted by Guest — Mon Jan 21, 2002 4:36 pm

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-21T16:21:00-04:00

I could be wrong, but wouldn't this even mess up things such as mIRC's IAL and other clients/client features?

Statistics: Posted by Wcc — Mon Jan 21, 2002 4:21 pm

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-21T13:42:00-04:00

What ircd is this? I wouldn't mind contacting the developers .. changing the basic syntax of /who is a very silly thing to do. I'd like to see their good reasons for changing it.

Anyone else agree with me?
Jeff

Statistics: Posted by guppy — Mon Jan 21, 2002 1:42 pm

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-21T05:49:00-04:00

It's easy, look through the source code for where the "WHO" command is issued (try using grep) and change it to "WHO +c", just like you said.

Statistics: Posted by stdragon — Mon Jan 21, 2002 5:49 am

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-21T04:18:00-04:00

If you wont, start using mIRC bots.. heeheh

Statistics: Posted by Yourname — Mon Jan 21, 2002 4:18 am

Non RFC-compiland /who servers

2002-01-21T01:30:00-04:00

Hi

what should I do to my eggdrop work corretly on a non RFC-compilant ircd (where the /who it's diferent) ?

To see the names list of a channel, people should use /who +c #channel (but on RFC-compilant just /who #channel it's necessary).

What should I do ? (No, I won't change my ircd!)

Statistics: Posted by Guest — Mon Jan 21, 2002 1:30 am