<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/8466" />

	<title>egghelp/eggheads community</title>
	<subtitle>Discussion of eggdrop bots, shell accounts and tcl scripts.</subtitle>
	<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/index.php" />
	<updated>2004-11-03T08:29:03-04:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[egghelp/eggheads community]]></name></author>
	<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/8466</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></name></author>
		<updated>2004-11-03T08:29:03-04:00</updated>

		<published>2004-11-03T08:29:03-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42495#p42495</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42495#p42495"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Request for anti socks4/5 via 3128 &amp; 8080 port]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42495#p42495"><![CDATA[
just a n00b question.<br><br>Why dont you use a clone detection Script ?<br><br><a href="http://www.egghelp.org/cgi-bin/tcl_archive.tcl?strings=clone&amp;fields=title&amp;fields=author&amp;fields=description" class="postlink">http://www.egghelp.org/cgi-bin/tcl_arch ... escription</a><p>Statistics: Posted by Guest — Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:29 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Ofloo]]></name></author>
		<updated>2004-10-29T06:48:30-04:00</updated>

		<published>2004-10-29T06:48:30-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42368#p42368</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42368#p42368"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Request for anti socks4/5 via 3128 &amp; 8080 port]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42368#p42368"><![CDATA[
well that can be fixed by using a limit script anyway so .. but isn't the irc network checking for open proxys ?? if so there no point for u double checking this..<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3151">Ofloo</a> — Fri Oct 29, 2004 6:48 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[caesar]]></name></author>
		<updated>2004-10-20T06:38:59-04:00</updated>

		<published>2004-10-20T06:38:59-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42024#p42024</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42024#p42024"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Request for anti socks4/5 via 3128 &amp; 8080 port]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42024#p42024"><![CDATA[
As user said this is pointless. Testing an ip if it's an open socks or web proxy will take you a lot. Anyway, in case of a join-flood your eggdrop will die upon tring to check them all.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=187">caesar</a> — Wed Oct 20, 2004 6:38 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></name></author>
		<updated>2004-10-20T03:42:53-04:00</updated>

		<published>2004-10-20T03:42:53-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42023#p42023</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42023#p42023"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Request for anti socks4/5 via 3128 &amp; 8080 port]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42023#p42023"><![CDATA[
thanks for the info <img class="smilies" src="https://forum.eggheads.org/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif" width="15" height="15" alt=":mrgreen:" title="Mr. Green"> CMIIW<br>anybody have the tcl?<p>Statistics: Posted by Guest — Wed Oct 20, 2004 3:42 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[user]]></name></author>
		<updated>2004-10-19T16:18:16-04:00</updated>

		<published>2004-10-19T16:18:16-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42014#p42014</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42014#p42014"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Request for anti socks4/5 via 3128 &amp; 8080 port]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42014#p42014"><![CDATA[
Proxies on ports 8080 and 3128 are usually NOT socks4/5. (they're web proxies, the default port for socks is 1080) So probing those ports to check for socks behaviour would most likely be pointless.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2878">user</a> — Tue Oct 19, 2004 4:18 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></name></author>
		<updated>2004-10-19T04:49:02-04:00</updated>

		<published>2004-10-19T04:49:02-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42006#p42006</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42006#p42006"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Request for anti socks4/5 via 3128 &amp; 8080 port]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=42006#p42006"><![CDATA[
my channels get heavy sock clone flooding in this 2 days, anybody have the tcl to ban clone socks4/socks5 via 8080 and 3128 port who join the chan? please help. thanks<p>Statistics: Posted by Guest — Tue Oct 19, 2004 4:49 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
