egghelp/eggheads community Discussion of eggdrop bots, shell accounts and tcl scripts. 2004-08-14T09:34:17-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/7510 2004-08-14T09:34:17-04:00 2004-08-14T09:34:17-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=39776#p39776 <![CDATA[Netsplit Tcl]]> :roll: :(
Try a new skill ... Click! :-?

Statistics: Posted by WeiJie — Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:34 am

]]> 2004-08-14T09:33:27-04:00 2004-08-14T09:33:27-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=39775#p39775 <![CDATA[Netsplit Tcl]]> Statistics: Posted by WeiJie — Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:33 am

]]> 2004-08-13T09:30:31-04:00 2004-08-13T09:30:31-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=39746#p39746 <![CDATA[Netsplit Tcl]]> I chose to use, bind splt, rather than bind quit.

However if still users are manage to fake it, then on IRCnet nothing can be done I guess with the eggdrop, however we try. :mrgreen:

A bot is a bot, however AI it is, it can't detect a fake netsplit quit message if it is identical to the real one, heh. :wink:

The bot has a splt bind, so we might as well utilize it! :P

Statistics: Posted by awyeah — Fri Aug 13, 2004 9:30 am

]]> 2004-08-13T09:16:24-04:00 2004-08-13T09:16:24-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=39743#p39743 <![CDATA[Netsplit Tcl]]>
Actually, you can make one yourself. Not a big deal though! :roll:

[1] Bind on quit
[2] Check if the quit message contains the netsplit info/message
[3] Set the channel moderated if a user has quitted due to a netsplit

*Exceptions*

[1] Many users might quit due to a netsplit so we wouldn't want to modelock the channel after every user quits due to a netsplit. (This can cause a modelock flood!)
[2] First check if the modelock is not set on the chan by getchanmode, if it is set, then do not set any modelock. If it is not set then go ahead and modelock the channel. :wink:


Binding on quit messages can be easy
For example on DALnet we have:

* Quits awyeah (awyeah@awyeah.org) (Quit: mesra.kl.my.dal.net ninja.hub.us.dal.net)

Se we can say something like binding on quit and
if ([string match "*.dal.net*" [lindex $text 1]]) and same for list index 2.
This string matching procedure can be changed for every network as they might have different netsplit info/quit messages. :mrgreen:

OR

An easier way:

[1] Bind on splt.
[2] Mode lock the channel.
[3] Check for the exceptions as well when modelocking the channel.

In this we wouldn't need to string match the quit message as the bind will be triggered on splt anyway. ;)
Thats bad idea, because people can easily fake it.Net Split detect scripts for IRCNet are based on info channel (&servers) because there splits can't be faked and they can get time (how long server was splited).

Statistics: Posted by ]Kami[ — Fri Aug 13, 2004 9:16 am

]]> 2004-08-12T20:48:35-04:00 2004-08-12T20:48:35-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=39729#p39729 <![CDATA[Netsplit Tcl]]>

[1] Bind on quit
[2] Check if the quit message contains the netsplit info/message
[3] Set the channel moderated if a user has quitted due to a netsplit

*Exceptions*

[1] Many users might quit due to a netsplit so we wouldn't want to modelock the channel after every user quits due to a netsplit. (This can cause a modelock flood!)
[2] First check if the modelock is not set on the chan by getchanmode, if it is set, then do not set any modelock. If it is not set then go ahead and modelock the channel. :wink:


Binding on quit messages can be easy
For example on DALnet we have:

* Quits awyeah (awyeah@awyeah.org) (Quit: mesra.kl.my.dal.net ninja.hub.us.dal.net)

Se we can say something like binding on quit and
if ([string match "*.dal.net*" [lindex $text 1]]) and same for list index 2.
This string matching procedure can be changed for every network as they might have different netsplit info/quit messages. :mrgreen:

OR

An easier way:

[1] Bind on splt.
[2] Mode lock the channel.
[3] Check for the exceptions as well when modelocking the channel.

In this we wouldn't need to string match the quit message as the bind will be triggered on splt anyway. ;)

Statistics: Posted by awyeah — Thu Aug 12, 2004 8:48 pm

]]> 2004-08-12T20:13:32-04:00 2004-08-12T20:13:32-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=39726#p39726 <![CDATA[Netsplit Tcl]]> Click! :-?

Statistics: Posted by Alchera — Thu Aug 12, 2004 8:13 pm

]]> 2004-08-12T19:51:51-04:00 2004-08-12T19:51:51-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=39725#p39725 <![CDATA[Netsplit Tcl]]>
Thanks! :mrgreen:

Statistics: Posted by WeiJie — Thu Aug 12, 2004 7:51 pm

]]> 2004-05-26T20:59:01-04:00 2004-05-26T20:59:01-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=36617#p36617 <![CDATA[Netsplit Tcl]]>
The website above seems unable to go in... Is there other site?
Worked for me OK! :)
It's worked for me now but I think few days back the website was currently down for me. :P I got this TCL, but doesn't seems to work (set moderated to channel) when netsplit. Anyone still got any suggestions? :roll:

Statistics: Posted by WeiJie — Wed May 26, 2004 8:59 pm

]]> 2004-05-25T06:45:59-04:00 2004-05-25T06:45:59-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=36587#p36587 <![CDATA[Netsplit Tcl]]>
The website above seems unable to go in... Is there other site?
Worked for me OK! :)

Statistics: Posted by Alchera — Tue May 25, 2004 6:45 am

]]> 2004-05-25T03:31:10-04:00 2004-05-25T03:31:10-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=36583#p36583 <![CDATA[Re: Netsplit Tcl]]>
http://suczki.org/~m/split.tcl ? :)
The website above seems unable to go in... Is there other site? :D :roll: :wink:

Statistics: Posted by WeiJie — Tue May 25, 2004 3:31 am

]]> 2004-05-22T11:34:05-04:00 2004-05-22T11:34:05-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=36524#p36524 <![CDATA[Re: Netsplit Tcl]]> http://suczki.org/~m/split.tcl ? :)

Statistics: Posted by kem — Sat May 22, 2004 11:34 am

]]> 2004-05-20T21:32:19-04:00 2004-05-20T21:32:19-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=36480#p36480 <![CDATA[Netsplit Tcl]]>

Statistics: Posted by WeiJie — Thu May 20, 2004 9:32 pm

]]>