egghelp/eggheads community

i wonder if ..........

2003-10-25T23:12:01-04:00

If you mean do notice the user IF they are on the partyline when .chut is called upon them, then you would make the code:

Code:

bind dcc n chut dcc:chut proc dcc:chut {hand idx text} {   if {([set chuthand [lindex [split $text] 0]] == "") || (([set onoff [string tolower [lindex [split $text] 1]]] != "on") && ($onoff != "off"))} {     putdcc $idx "Usage: .chut  "     return 0   } elseif {![validuser $chuthand]} {     putdcc $idx "Invalid user ${chuthand}!"     return 0   } elseif {$onoff == "on"} {     if {[matchattr $chuthand M]} {       putdcc $idx "User $chuthand is already muted."       return 0     }     chattr $chuthand +M    if {[set chidx [hand2idx $chuthand]] > -1} {      putdcc $chidx "You have now been muted at request of $hand."    }    putdcc $idx "User $chuthand is now muted."   } elseif {$onoff == "off"} {     if {![matchattr $chuthand M]} {       putdcc "$idx "User $chuthand is not muted."       return 0     }     chattr $chuthand -M     if {[set chidx [hand2idx $chuthand]] > -1} {      putdcc $chidx "You have been unmuted at request of $hand."    }    putdcc $idx "User $chuthand is no longer muted."   }   set res 1  }

If you mean they get a notice whenever they try to type on the partyline:

Code:

bind filt - * chatChk proc chatChk {i t} {   if {[catch {getchan $i}]||[string match .* $t]||![matchattr [idx2hand $i] M]} {    set t  } else {    putdcc $i "You are currently muted and not allowed to speak on the partyline."    set res ""  }}

Statistics: Posted by strikelight — Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:12 pm

i wonder if ..........

2003-10-25T21:30:10-04:00

great ! sorry not to have read carefully the last time i have one more simple request , when i do .chut (handle) on i`d like the user to be warn that he is currently under the ".chut " but a putdcc $chuthand doesnt work how can i do that ?

thanks

Statistics: Posted by Pitchat — Sat Oct 25, 2003 9:30 pm

i wonder if ..........

2003-10-25T20:51:41-04:00

great it works but to remove the "chut" what i have to do is .chattr nick -M is it right ? ( cause .-chut nick doesnt work)

i modified the code to reflect this..

you do '.chut on' to mute and '.chut off' to unmute.

Statistics: Posted by strikelight — Sat Oct 25, 2003 8:51 pm

i wonder if ..........

2003-10-25T20:49:44-04:00

great it works but to remove the "chut" what i have to do is .chattr nick -M is it right ? ( cause .-chut nick doesnt work)

Statistics: Posted by Pitchat — Sat Oct 25, 2003 8:49 pm

i wonder if ..........

2003-10-25T20:50:12-04:00

all you need to do is .chattr +M

but, yes, you can make an alias for doing this, for use with the previous mentioned code:

Code:

bind dcc n chut dcc:chutproc dcc:chut {hand idx text} {  if {[set chuthand [lindex [split $text] 0]] == ""} {    putdcc $idx "Usage: .chut "    return 0  } elseif {![validuser $chuthand]} {    putdcc $idx "Invalid user ${chuthand}!"    return 0  } elseif {[set onoff [string tolower [lindex [split $text] 1]]] == "on"} {    if {[matchattr $chuthand M]} {      putdcc $idx "User $chuthand is already muted."      return 0    }    chattr $chuthand +M    putdcc $idx "User $chuthand is now muted."  } elseif {$onoff == "off"} {    if {![matchattr $chuthand M]} {      putdcc "$idx "User $chuthand is not muted."      return 0    }    chattr $chuthand -M    putdcc $idx "User $chuthand is no longer muted."  }  set res 1  }

Statistics: Posted by strikelight — Sat Oct 25, 2003 8:41 pm

i wonder if ..........

2003-10-25T19:27:08-04:00

so is it possible tu bind this to a command like .chut (nick ) and it will put the +m flag to the (nick) and remove ihis ability to speak on the partyline ?

Statistics: Posted by Pitchat — Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:27 pm

i wonder if ..........

2003-10-25T11:53:28-04:00

It would be more practical to make it so chattr'ing a user with a flag would mean that they can't speak on the partyline.. As if you have 300 users, you wouldn't want to chattr each one with +P just so they can speak on the partyline, when all you want to do is mute a few select users...
ie.

Code:

bind filt - * chatChk proc chatChk {i t} {   if {[catch {getchan $i}]||[string match .* $t]||![matchattr [idx2hand $i] M]} {set t} }

So this would mean +M users would not be able to speak on the partyline.

Statistics: Posted by strikelight — Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:53 am

Re: i wonder if ..........

2003-10-25T11:03:06-04:00

This will make the user defined flag P required to speak on the partyline (or any other botnet channel):

Code:

bind filt - * chatChkproc chatChk {i t} {  if {[catch {getchan $i}]||[string match .* $t]||[matchattr [idx2hand $i] P]} {set t}}

Statistics: Posted by user — Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:03 am

i wonder if ..........

2003-10-25T09:46:47-04:00

Use the bind filt and a certain flag (in this case M) like this:

Code:

bind filt - ".status *" dcc:allowproc dcc:allow {idx args} {   set usernick [idx2hand $idx]  if {[lindex $args 1] == ""} {     set icmd [lindex $args 0]    set args "$icmd "  }  if {![matchattr $usernick M]} {    putdcc $idx "What? You need '.help'"    } else {    return $args  }}

Statistics: Posted by caesar — Sat Oct 25, 2003 9:46 am

i wonder if ..........

2003-10-25T02:54:49-04:00

I think u may remove the +p ability of that person

It`s an idea i dont know for user, i am new in eggdrop.

Statistics: Posted by duofruo — Sat Oct 25, 2003 2:54 am

i wonder if ..........

2003-10-24T23:31:37-04:00

Hi

i wonder if it is possible to do a command like .chut (handle) and it cuts the ability for this person to say something in partyline until i type .chut (handle ) off ??

thanks for all advice that may be handy

Pitchat

Statistics: Posted by Pitchat — Fri Oct 24, 2003 11:31 pm