egghelp/eggheads community

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-17T01:09:47-04:00

I don't think you can :/

Statistics: Posted by BarkerJr — Fri Oct 17, 2003 1:09 am

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-16T18:40:23-04:00

On the same topic, how do you set ban mask like *.*@userhost/ip.com.au when eggdrop bans as revenge for deop or for flood with botnet repeat component.

Statistics: Posted by Vinh — Thu Oct 16, 2003 6:40 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-16T16:30:57-04:00

I think \017 is plain (CTRL+O), too.

Statistics: Posted by BarkerJr — Thu Oct 16, 2003 4:30 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-16T13:32:09-04:00

Code:

bind pubm - "*\002*" ban:colorsbind pubm - "*\003*" ban:colorsbind pubm - "*\026*" ban:colorsbind pubm - "*\037*" ban:colorsproc ban:colors {nick uhost hand chan text} {  if {[matchattr $hand of|fo $chan] || [isop $nick $chan]} {    return  }  scan $uhost "%\[^@\]@%s" user host  newchanban $chan *!*@$host Colours "No colours, bold, etc. in $chan channel." 5}

Statistics: Posted by caesar — Thu Oct 16, 2003 1:32 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-16T13:23:54-04:00

Yeap, but I get a little confusing here.. Can you post more details / full script for it..

Thanks

Statistics: Posted by blood_x — Thu Oct 16, 2003 1:23 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-16T13:07:57-04:00

That means he wants to place a ban that matches his host, wich means the person that triggered the *banning* proc is a clone or the ban is an bad mask, something like *!*@* .. As Sir_Fz said, there is no need of the string tolower's. Why don't you just use the ban thing I've posted? Is a lot faster than the stuff you posted.. at least in my tests it is.

Statistics: Posted by caesar — Thu Oct 16, 2003 1:07 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-16T12:59:43-04:00

Argh, error ---> Wanted to ban myself--deflected.

Statistics: Posted by blood_x — Thu Oct 16, 2003 12:59 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-15T18:35:57-04:00

i guess so, but dont ask.. try it. also the string tolower isn't so much needed.

Statistics: Posted by Sir_Fz — Wed Oct 15, 2003 6:35 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-15T07:52:39-04:00

How about if I change both Bmask Line to;

set uhost [string tolower $uhost]
set bmask *!*[string tolower [string range $uhost [string first "@" $uhost] end]]

Does it work to ban *!*@host.domain..

Statistics: Posted by blood_x — Wed Oct 15, 2003 7:52 am

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-14T16:14:10-04:00

something like..

Code:

scan $uhost "%\[^@\]@%s" user hostnewchanban $chan $host $botnick [subst $chanpro(ban_color)] $chanpro(ban_time_color)

be shure you have in the bind uhost, if not change to it's actual name.

Statistics: Posted by caesar — Tue Oct 14, 2003 4:14 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-14T16:13:49-04:00

replace both with the code I gave you.

what caesar meant is that if the offender is the one who triggers the proc, then getchanhost won't be needed, instead just use $host or $uhost (depends on what you call it in the proc)

Statistics: Posted by Sir_Fz — Tue Oct 14, 2003 4:13 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-14T15:42:34-04:00

Can you give some example Caesar..

Statistics: Posted by blood_x — Tue Oct 14, 2003 3:42 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-14T15:39:08-04:00

If the person that triggers the proc it's the same as the person that should be banned then drop the [getchanhost $nick $chan] part and use host or whatever you've put in that proc.

Statistics: Posted by caesar — Tue Oct 14, 2003 3:39 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-14T15:26:57-04:00

set bmask *!*@[lindex [split [getchanhost $nick $chan] @] 1]

this will ban in form *!*@host

Change for line bmask 1 or line bmask 2? Or just remove both and adding only 1 line for it?

Statistics: Posted by blood_x — Tue Oct 14, 2003 3:26 pm

Chanpro1.4.tcl Enhancement

2003-10-14T15:12:17-04:00

set bmask *!*@[lindex [split [getchanhost $nick $chan] @] 1]

this will ban in form *!*@host

Statistics: Posted by Sir_Fz — Tue Oct 14, 2003 3:12 pm