<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/5592" />

	<title>egghelp/eggheads community</title>
	<subtitle>Discussion of eggdrop bots, shell accounts and tcl scripts.</subtitle>
	<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/index.php" />
	<updated>2003-09-17T21:40:09-04:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[egghelp/eggheads community]]></name></author>
	<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/5592</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[strikelight]]></name></author>
		<updated>2003-09-17T21:40:09-04:00</updated>

		<published>2003-09-17T21:40:09-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27232#p27232</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27232#p27232"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[make bot ctcp anyone]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27232#p27232"><![CDATA[
<blockquote class="uncited"><div>Using PRIVMSG and NOTICE is pretty efficient.<br><br>The machanism is allready defined and clients need no changes to support it.<br><br>All RFC are only drafts. They are not standards, however, in most cases, they are followed as a official due to the ready available source.<br><br>IRC uses a barebones structure and has very few commands. Most of the commands that do exist are for server maintainance or administration.<br><br>Adding new commands for CTCP would have been like producing a whole new HTTP protocol just for dealing with encrypted trafic.<br><br>Instead, they used an existing layer available, and channeled it over encrypted links instead.</div></blockquote>The point is, it WAS infact added as an after-thought, which you just stated yourself.<br><br>QED.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2005">strikelight</a> — Wed Sep 17, 2003 9:40 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[ppslim]]></name></author>
		<updated>2003-09-17T07:31:29-04:00</updated>

		<published>2003-09-17T07:31:29-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27189#p27189</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27189#p27189"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[make bot ctcp anyone]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27189#p27189"><![CDATA[
Using PRIVMSG and NOTICE is pretty efficient.<br><br>The machanism is allready defined and clients need no changes to support it.<br><br>All RFC are only drafts. They are not standards, however, in most cases, they are followed as a official due to the ready available source.<br><br>IRC uses a barebones structure and has very few commands. Most of the commands that do exist are for server maintainance or administration.<br><br>Adding new commands for CTCP would have been like producing a whole new HTTP protocol just for dealing with encrypted trafic.<br><br>Instead, they used an existing layer available, and channeled it over encrypted links instead.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2">ppslim</a> — Wed Sep 17, 2003 7:31 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[strikelight]]></name></author>
		<updated>2003-09-16T14:13:01-04:00</updated>

		<published>2003-09-16T14:13:01-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27161#p27161</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27161#p27161"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[make bot ctcp anyone]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27161#p27161"><![CDATA[
<blockquote class="uncited"><div>As for the origin of CTCP, nope, this wasn't a mIRC contraption.<br><br>It was invented as a method of automating / program a client to relact on somthing, exactly as it does for VERSIon and even DCC.<br><br>As such, allmost every script should be written to react through CTCP, however,t hat would be too easy and who follows a standard anyhow.</div></blockquote>It's hard to follow a "standard" when it was never originally standardized in the original RFC's...<br><br>When IRC was first created, as you can guess, CTCP wouldn't have even been a concept yet... No real need for it... As such, I suspect it would have been the earliest client program to introduce it, most likely ircII ...<br><br>You can tell that it is an after thought, implemented initially by a client program, as it uses 'PRIVMSG' and 'NOTICE' in it's protocol, instead of having it's very own seperate command.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2005">strikelight</a> — Tue Sep 16, 2003 2:13 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Dedan]]></name></author>
		<updated>2003-09-16T13:31:13-04:00</updated>

		<published>2003-09-16T13:31:13-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27157#p27157</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27157#p27157"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[make bot ctcp anyone]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27157#p27157"><![CDATA[
I don't know what i did the first few times<br>but i got it now  ... <br>thanks for the help ppslim  <img class="smilies" src="https://forum.eggheads.org/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif" width="15" height="15" alt="8)" title="Cool"><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3472">Dedan</a> — Tue Sep 16, 2003 1:31 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Dedan]]></name></author>
		<updated>2003-09-16T13:25:37-04:00</updated>

		<published>2003-09-16T13:25:37-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27154#p27154</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27154#p27154"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[make bot ctcp anyone]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27154#p27154"><![CDATA[
putserv "NOTICE $nick :\001VERSION Addon: BotServ v1.1\001"<br>returns<br>[Zipporah VERSION reply]: Addon: BotServ v1.1<br><br>is there anyway to drop the 2nd ":" ?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3472">Dedan</a> — Tue Sep 16, 2003 1:25 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[ppslim]]></name></author>
		<updated>2003-09-16T06:56:31-04:00</updated>

		<published>2003-09-16T06:56:31-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27143#p27143</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27143#p27143"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[make bot ctcp anyone]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27143#p27143"><![CDATA[
Use PRIVMSG for the CTCP query portion, and NOTICE for the CTCP reply.<br><br>The format should be<br><br>putserv "NOTICE $nick :\001VERSION Addon: BotServ v1.1\001"<br><br>As for the origin of CTCP, nope, this wasn't a mIRC contraption.<br><br>It was invented as a method of automating / program a client to relact on somthing, exactly as it does for VERSIon and even DCC.<br><br>As such, allmost every script should be written to react through CTCP, however,t hat would be too easy and who follows a standard anyhow.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2">ppslim</a> — Tue Sep 16, 2003 6:56 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Dedan]]></name></author>
		<updated>2003-09-15T23:04:23-04:00</updated>

		<published>2003-09-15T23:04:23-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27120#p27120</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27120#p27120"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[make bot ctcp anyone]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27120#p27120"><![CDATA[
that's closer ... i am getting something back.<br><br>I am trying to add a extra version reply<br>to the regular one  ... i want 2 replies<br>to be sent to the person who versions the bot.<br><br>the problem with the above code is that it<br>cuts off the 2nd word between the \001 \001's<br><br>I get:<br>[porah VERSION] reply<br><br>instead of:<br>[porah VERSION reply]: <br><br>I tried:<br><br> putserv "PRIVMSG $nick :\001VERSION reply\001 Addon: BotServ v1.1" <br><br>and:<br><br>set vreply "VERSION reply"  <br> putserv "PRIVMSG $nick :\001$vreply\001 Addon: BotServ v1.1" <br><br><br>also tryied these, i listed their returns under the script:<br><br>putserv "NOTICE $nick :\001VERSION \003reply\001 Addon: BotServ v1.1"<br>[porah VERSION reply]: reply<br><br><br>putserv "NOTICE $nick :\001VERSION \reply : Addon: BotServ v1.1\001"<br>[porah VERSION reply]<br><br><br>putserv "NOTICE $nick :\001VERSION \reply\001\001: Addon: BotServ v1.1\001"<br>[porah VERSION reply]<br><br>any ideas?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3472">Dedan</a> — Mon Sep 15, 2003 11:04 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[strikelight]]></name></author>
		<updated>2003-09-15T22:41:23-04:00</updated>

		<published>2003-09-15T22:41:23-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27119#p27119</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27119#p27119"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: make bot ctcp anyone]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27119#p27119"><![CDATA[
<blockquote class="uncited"><div>I have been trying to get the bot to<br>ctcp a message to a nick for the last 2 hours<br><br>I thought this would do it:<br><br> putserv "ctcp $nick :newmessage" <br><br>so, what is the sceret?<br><br>thanks for any help given</div></blockquote>CTCP's are actually a client program invention (probably mIRC), which are really regular private messages (PRIVMSG's)...<br><br>putserv "PRIVMSG $nick :\001&lt;ctcp query&gt;\001"<br><br>should do the trick for you.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2005">strikelight</a> — Mon Sep 15, 2003 10:41 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Dedan]]></name></author>
		<updated>2003-09-15T22:33:44-04:00</updated>

		<published>2003-09-15T22:33:44-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27118#p27118</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27118#p27118"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[make bot ctcp anyone]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=27118#p27118"><![CDATA[
I have been trying to get the bot to<br>ctcp a message to a nick for the last 2 hours<br><br>I thought this would do it:<br><br> putserv "ctcp $nick :newmessage" <br><br>so, what is the sceret?<br><br>thanks for any help given<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3472">Dedan</a> — Mon Sep 15, 2003 10:33 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
