egghelp/eggheads community

raw notice

2003-05-23T08:22:13-04:00

This might be an old TCL or something like this, not shure of it anyway.

In that case he's not got the equal option at all... abbreviation has been avaliable for the string command since at least 7.6 and the equal option was added in 8.1 iirc.

could somebody tell me the complete code and if it's possible to make a list of notices that I'd like bot not to show.

I already gave you some complete code...if you don't believe me, try 'info complete '

And, yes, it's possible to make a list of the notices you don't want to show, but then you'd also need a script using that list for something, right?

Statistics: Posted by user — Fri May 23, 2003 8:22 am

raw notice

2003-05-23T07:55:14-04:00

could somebody tell me the complete code and if it's possible to make a list of notices that I'd like bot not to show.

Statistics: Posted by ReaLz — Fri May 23, 2003 7:55 am

raw notice

2003-05-23T07:25:51-04:00

Yes, I agree with you user on the abbreviated part, but seems that is not working propertly on Realz script. This might be an old TCL or something like this, not shure of it anyway.

Statistics: Posted by caesar — Fri May 23, 2003 7:25 am

raw notice

2003-05-23T06:35:34-04:00

Options can be abbreviated. That means you only need the minimum number of chars that uniquely identifies an option..eg:
'string e ...' works fine because 'equal' is the only option starting with an 'e', but if you'd do 'string i ...' you get an error message like 'ambiguous option "i": must be '.

Commands that accept abbreviated options has this stated on their manual page. So check the manual before doing it and keep in mind that options added in a future version of Tcl may render your option ambiguous.

Statistics: Posted by user — Fri May 23, 2003 6:35 am

raw notice

2003-05-23T06:30:14-04:00

You are quite correct. However, so is User.

Tcl uses an abbreviation system, so as long as there are not two commands clashing with your abbreaviation, Tcl will work.

Look at the lines of lindex. You can use end, en or e as the index, to mean the last idx.

Another example, using "chann set #channel +test" works fine for eggdrop commands in Tcl, due to the abbreviation system.

Statistics: Posted by ppslim — Fri May 23, 2003 6:30 am

raw notice

2003-05-23T06:17:26-04:00

I was talking about the "string eq" thing, as far as I know there is no eq in the string, just the equal. Correct me if I'm wrong..

Statistics: Posted by caesar — Fri May 23, 2003 6:17 am

raw notice

2003-05-23T06:10:26-04:00

Try with equal, instead of eq.

Why? Actually a single "e" is enough.

Statistics: Posted by user — Fri May 23, 2003 6:10 am

raw notice

2003-05-23T05:56:08-04:00

Try with equal, instead of eq.

Statistics: Posted by caesar — Fri May 23, 2003 5:56 am

raw notice

2003-05-23T04:51:10-04:00

an error occured:

Code:

[10:55] Tcl error [xnotc]: syntax error in expression "[string eq $f "X!cservice@undernet.org"]&&\ [string first ""

Statistics: Posted by ReaLz — Fri May 23, 2003 4:51 am

raw notice

2003-05-23T02:37:02-04:00

that last expr should do it all...btw: remember the bind

Statistics: Posted by user — Fri May 23, 2003 2:37 am

raw notice

2003-05-23T02:29:48-04:00

and where does the return 0 go?

Statistics: Posted by ReaLz — Fri May 23, 2003 2:29 am

raw notice

2003-05-22T17:00:56-04:00

Do you want us to hold your hand while you copy and paste it too?

Code:

proc xnotc {f k a} {    expr {[string eq $f "X!cservice@undernet.org"]&&\          [string first "Specified ban is already in my banlist!" $a]>-1}}

Statistics: Posted by user — Thu May 22, 2003 5:00 pm

raw notice

2003-05-22T16:26:51-04:00

so what is the complete code?

Statistics: Posted by ReaLz — Thu May 22, 2003 4:26 pm

raw notice

2003-05-22T16:15:50-04:00

Bah..you're rigth Papillon

Statistics: Posted by user — Thu May 22, 2003 4:15 pm

raw notice

2003-05-22T16:10:34-04:00

...Or could of course skip the adding and make the bind for - instead of X and do if {[string eq $f "X!cservice@undernet.org"]} {return 0} before the expr.

he would have to do that cause bind raw ignores flags

Statistics: Posted by Papillon — Thu May 22, 2003 4:10 pm