egghelp/eggheads community Discussion of eggdrop bots, shell accounts and tcl scripts. 2003-02-16T02:20:32-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/3687 2003-02-16T02:20:32-04:00 2003-02-16T02:20:32-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=16649#p16649 <![CDATA[Suspend user access?]]>
But this is sort of a neat way to do it if you use "hand" as the handle variable:

Code: 

proc check_for_s {} {  upvar hand hand  if {[matchattr $hand +S]} {    return -code return 0  }  return 0}proc blahproc {nick uhost hand chan text} {  # just one command, no "if", no "return", no arguments  check_for_s  ...   rest of proc  ...}

Statistics: Posted by stdragon — Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:20 am

]]> 2003-02-15T21:05:43-04:00 2003-02-15T21:05:43-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=16645#p16645 <![CDATA[Suspend user access?]]>
Currently, users have access to specific commands on the bot (that I coded) if they have the C flag. Now, I would like to make a command where I (the owner) can suspend their access without removing the C flag. I was thinking of adding an S flag for their handle but that would get tedious to add a check if they have the S flag for every proc (I could do it but I'm looking for a shorter way :)).

So I was wondering if there is a way to use bind so it only processes if the S flag is NOT on the user's handle? Something like

Code: 

bind pub +C-S !blah blahproc
However, that (obviously) doesn't work because the - is used for any user and the + just screws it up :).

Is there *any* way to do it with binds? If not, what would be the shortest way to do it otherwise?

Thanks,
scr0llwheel

Statistics: Posted by scr0llwheel — Sat Feb 15, 2003 9:05 pm

]]>