<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/3299" />

	<title>egghelp/eggheads community</title>
	<subtitle>Discussion of eggdrop bots, shell accounts and tcl scripts.</subtitle>
	<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/index.php" />
	<updated>2002-12-23T12:07:57-04:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[egghelp/eggheads community]]></name></author>
	<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/3299</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[ppslim]]></name></author>
		<updated>2002-12-23T12:07:57-04:00</updated>

		<published>2002-12-23T12:07:57-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14518#p14518</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14518#p14518"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Max eggdrops &amp; info?]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14518#p14518"><![CDATA[
It's functionaly stupid to usr this many eggdrop from one machine.<br><br>1: A single DDOS -  or DOS for that matter - attack would render your botnet usless.<br><br>2: It's a prime way to get yourself a k-line on the IRC server. Many admins do not like this many bots sitting on there servers, from a single machine.<br><br>3: It's a processor burden. If using each bot for different purposes, you get the processor hit from a bot doing one task, effecting others.<br><br>4: bandwidth. Simalar to DOS attacks, it wouldn't take much to flood a net like this off. If I run a single bot of a dialup connection, I get one load of traffic, for all channels runnign through this connection. If I have 20 bots, runnign from this dial-up connection (stupid, but the example is valid), I get the exact same traffic, repeated through the connection 20 times. Allthough the traffic is the same, it still has to be downloaded. So what may seem like a sinple flood to a dial-up users, may kill a DSL connection with 20 bots on.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2">ppslim</a> — Mon Dec 23, 2002 12:07 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Nexus6]]></name></author>
		<updated>2002-12-23T02:57:24-04:00</updated>

		<published>2002-12-23T02:57:24-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14515#p14515</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14515#p14515"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Max eggdrops &amp; info?]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14515#p14515"><![CDATA[
imho it's a personal matter, and in this case your friend prolly wants to make his chans look bigger.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1850">Nexus6</a> — Mon Dec 23, 2002 2:57 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></name></author>
		<updated>2002-12-22T21:02:49-04:00</updated>

		<published>2002-12-22T21:02:49-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14508#p14508</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14508#p14508"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Max eggdrops &amp; info?]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14508#p14508"><![CDATA[
Okay, i have a two questions..<br>Since a friend is running &gt;20 eggdrops on one pII-300 box same network same channel im wondering if its such a good idea.. i mean a few eggdrops draw pretty much processes.. but what about 20+ in 10+ channels each?... can anyone find any good reason for doing something like this or is it just plain stupid?<br>//Alpha<p>Statistics: Posted by Guest — Sun Dec 22, 2002 9:02 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
