<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/3291" />

	<title>egghelp/eggheads community</title>
	<subtitle>Discussion of eggdrop bots, shell accounts and tcl scripts.</subtitle>
	<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/index.php" />
	<updated>2002-12-21T18:37:41-04:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[egghelp/eggheads community]]></name></author>
	<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/3291</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[z_one]]></name></author>
		<updated>2002-12-21T18:37:41-04:00</updated>

		<published>2002-12-21T18:37:41-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14479#p14479</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14479#p14479"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Using sentinel with another script to lock a channel]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14479#p14479"><![CDATA[
Well, I'll use another flood argument (thx for the hint)  <img class="smilies" src="https://forum.eggheads.org/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" width="15" height="15" alt=":wink:" title="Wink"> <br>As for the fact that you cannot give any garantuee, I understand that, and I'll do it at my own risk.<br>Anyway, as you said, there's nothing that seems to forbid doing that in the code. It's just that I need to centralize the locking process.<br><br>z_one<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=698">z_one</a> — Sat Dec 21, 2002 6:37 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[slennox]]></name></author>
		<updated>2002-12-21T15:48:40-04:00</updated>

		<published>2002-12-21T15:48:40-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14477#p14477</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14477#p14477"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Using sentinel with another script to lock a channel]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14477#p14477"><![CDATA[
After skimming the code, there's nothing that stands out as a reason against doing this, except that you don't want to use a flood type argument used by sentinel otherwise you won't be able to tell which script triggered it. In any case, I can't guarantee the behaviour will be what you're expecting.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=13034">slennox</a> — Sat Dec 21, 2002 3:48 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[z_one]]></name></author>
		<updated>2002-12-21T15:02:28-04:00</updated>

		<published>2002-12-21T15:02:28-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14476#p14476</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14476#p14476"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Using sentinel with another script to lock a channel]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=14476#p14476"><![CDATA[
I wrote a script and I need to make it use Sentinel's locking mechanism in order to keep things centralized.<br>Is it enough to use the following line from my script to lock a channel (if netbots is loaded of course) ?<br><div class="codebox"><p>Code: </p><pre><code>sl_lock $chan "TEXT flood" ${botnet-nick}</code></pre></div>z_one<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=698">z_one</a> — Sat Dec 21, 2002 3:02 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
