egghelp/eggheads community

anti idle suggestion

2002-11-28T16:19:58-04:00

Quite the contrary actually. Having the bots join a random channel every so often would in effect do the same exact thing, but use a little more bw and cpu load, and also require a bit of code that really isn't needed. On a network that is that strict about bots I could see this usefull (actively hunting bots or something similar), but most networks leave most bots alone as long as they don't bother anyone.

Statistics: Posted by tainted — Thu Nov 28, 2002 4:19 pm

anti idle suggestion

2002-11-28T15:59:59-04:00

Well, just seems to make sence. I mean you could just .netjoin # then +nti that channel.. and set that channel in the netset.tcl.. its what I'm currently doing.. but I think it would be much more efficent if they would randomly change things. Anyone else have any thoughts?
nutbuckle

Statistics: Posted by Guest — Thu Nov 28, 2002 3:59 pm

anti idle suggestion

2002-11-28T15:37:10-04:00

That would definitely take anti-idle to the next level. But what is the reason for it?

Statistics: Posted by slennox — Thu Nov 28, 2002 3:37 pm

anti idle suggestion

2002-11-28T14:59:30-04:00

Would it be possible to have all the bots on the botnet join a random channel, then all send their messages to that channel.. then say have them change channels once every X hours?
nutbuckle

Statistics: Posted by Guest — Thu Nov 28, 2002 2:59 pm