egghelp/eggheads community Discussion of eggdrop bots, shell accounts and tcl scripts. 2002-07-23T16:37:26-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/2108 2002-07-23T16:37:26-04:00 2002-07-23T16:37:26-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9126#p9126 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.

OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet
server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not
good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)

Statistics: Posted by Bever — Tue Jul 23, 2002 4:37 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T16:13:55-04:00 2002-07-23T16:13:55-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9121#p9121 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.
OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)

Statistics: Posted by Bever — Tue Jul 23, 2002 4:13 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T16:09:02-04:00 2002-07-23T16:09:02-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9120#p9120 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.
OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)

Statistics: Posted by Bever — Tue Jul 23, 2002 4:09 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T16:02:38-04:00 2002-07-23T16:02:38-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9119#p9119 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.
OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)

Statistics: Posted by Bever — Tue Jul 23, 2002 4:02 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T16:01:35-04:00 2002-07-23T16:01:35-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9118#p9118 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.
OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)

Statistics: Posted by Bever — Tue Jul 23, 2002 4:01 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T16:00:30-04:00 2002-07-23T16:00:30-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9117#p9117 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.
OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)

Statistics: Posted by Bever — Tue Jul 23, 2002 4:00 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T15:24:52-04:00 2002-07-23T15:24:52-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9116#p9116 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
and its only gotten better and better since i've been a customer.
whenever someone asks for references for good shell providers, ive always included sharpnet in the list.
Same with me.. Since the time I've been having a sharpnet account, it all went really great except a couple things I don't even remember. And yeah, sharpnet tops my list of shell providers.

And what I feel is, Sharpnet is devoted to their work, unlike most of the other shell providers who start their shell company as a part-time hobby. And as a result, the admins dont find enuf time to cater to the needs of their customers. Also, you wont find shell providers active on IRC which most of the customers, like me, desire.. and Sharpnet has a good presence.

Other shell providers say we answer email better than IRC questions. And most of the time we either get the replies late, or even sometimes we dont get a reply! Most of the new enthusiastic users always want their account to get activated a.s.a.p, which can easily be done by IRC interaction, and which atleast 60% of the shell-providers are not good at maintaining.

Bottomline, Sharpnet comes out as a topper in my analysis. :D

Statistics: Posted by Yourname — Tue Jul 23, 2002 3:24 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T15:02:30-04:00 2002-07-23T15:02:30-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9115#p9115 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
and its only gotten better and better since i've been a customer.
whenever someone asks for references for good shell providers, ive always included sharpnet in the list.
Same with me.. Since the time I've been having a sharpnet account, it all went really great except a couple things I don't even remember. And yeah, sharpnet tops my list of shell providers.

And what I feel is, Sharpnet is devoted to their work, unlike most of the other shell providers who start their shell company as a part-time hobby. And as a result, the admins dont find enuf time to cater to the needs of their customers. Also, you wont find shell providers active on IRC which most of the customers, like me, desire.. and Sharpnet has a good presence.

Other shell providers say we answer email better than IRC questions. And most of the time we either get the replies late, or even sometimes we dont get a reply! Most of the new enthusiastic users always want their account to get activated a.s.a.p, which can easily be done by IRC interaction, and which atleast 60% of the shell-providers are not good at maintaining.

Bottomline, Sharpnet comes out as a topper in my analysis. :D

Statistics: Posted by Yourname — Tue Jul 23, 2002 3:02 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T14:56:35-04:00 2002-07-23T14:56:35-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9114#p9114 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
and its only gotten better and better since i've been a customer.
whenever someone asks for references for good shell providers, ive always included sharpnet in the list.
Same with me.. Since the time I've been having a sharpnet account, it all went really great except a couple things I don't even remember. And yeah, sharpnet tops my list of shell providers.

And what I feel is, Sharpnet is devoted to their work, unlike most of the other shell providers who start their shell company as a part-time hobby. And as a result, the admins dont find enuf time to cater to the needs of their customers. Also, you wont find shell providers active on IRC which most of the customers, like me, desire.. and Sharpnet has a good presence.

Other shell providers say we answer email better than IRC questions. And most of the time we either get the replies late, or even sometimes we dont get a reply! Most of the new enthusiastic users always want their account to get activated a.s.a.p, which can easily be done by IRC interaction, and which atleast 60% of the shell-providers are not good at maintaining.

Bottomline, Sharpnet comes out as a topper in my analysis. :D

Statistics: Posted by Yourname — Tue Jul 23, 2002 2:56 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T14:54:57-04:00 2002-07-23T14:54:57-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9113#p9113 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
and its only gotten better and better since i've been a customer.
whenever someone asks for references for good shell providers, ive always included sharpnet in the list.
Same with me.. Since the time I've been having a sharpnet account, it all went really great except a couple things I don't even remember. And yeah, sharpnet tops my list of shell providers.

And what I feel is, Sharpnet is devoted to their work, unlike most of the other shell providers who start their shell company as a part-time hobby. And as a result, the admins dont find enuf time to cater to the needs of their customers. Also, you wont find shell providers active on IRC which most of the customers, like me, desire.. and Sharpnet has a good presence.

Other shell providers say we answer email better than IRC questions. And most of the time we either get the replies late, or even sometimes we dont get a reply! Most of the new enthusiastic users always want their account to get activated a.s.a.p, which can easily be done by IRC interaction, and which atleast 60% of the shell-providers are not good at maintaining.

Bottomline, Sharpnet comes out as a topper in my analysis. :D

Statistics: Posted by Yourname — Tue Jul 23, 2002 2:54 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T14:54:04-04:00 2002-07-23T14:54:04-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9112#p9112 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
and its only gotten better and better since i've been a customer.
whenever someone asks for references for good shell providers, ive always included sharpnet in the list.
Same with me.. Since the time I've been having a sharpnet account, it all went really great except a couple things I don't even remember. And yeah, sharpnet tops my list of shell providers.

And what I feel is, Sharpnet is devoted to their work, unlike most of the other shell providers who start their shell company as a part-time hobby. And as a result, the admins dont find enuf time to cater to the needs of their customers. Also, you wont find shell providers active on IRC which most of the customers, like me, desire.. and Sharpnet has a good presence.

Other shell providers say we answer email better than IRC questions. And most of the time we either get the replies late, or even sometimes we dont get a reply! Most of the new enthusiastic users always want their account to get activated a.s.a.p, which can easily be done by IRC interaction, and which atleast 60% of the shell-providers are not good at maintaining.

Bottomline, Sharpnet comes out as a topper in my analysis. :D

Statistics: Posted by Yourname — Tue Jul 23, 2002 2:54 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T14:53:00-04:00 2002-07-23T14:53:00-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9111#p9111 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
and its only gotten better and better since i've been a customer.
whenever someone asks for references for good shell providers, ive always included sharpnet in the list.
Same with me.. Since the time I've been having a sharpnet account, it all went really great except a couple things I don't even remember. And yeah, sharpnet tops my list of shell providers.

And what I feel is, Sharpnet is devoted to their work, unlike most of the other shell providers who start their shell company as a part-time hobby. And as a result, the admins dont find enuf time to cater to the needs of their customers. Also, you wont find shell providers active on IRC which most of the customers, like me, desire.. and Sharpnet has a good presence.

Other shell providers say we answer email better than IRC questions. And most of the time we either get the replies late, or even sometimes we dont get a reply! Most of the new enthusiastic users always want their account to get activated a.s.a.p, which can easily be done by IRC interaction, and which atleast 60% of the shell-providers are not good at maintaining.

Bottomline, Sharpnet comes out as a topper in my analysis. :D

Statistics: Posted by Yourname — Tue Jul 23, 2002 2:53 pm

]]> 2002-07-23T04:41:03-04:00 2002-07-23T04:41:03-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9093#p9093 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]>
It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.

Statistics: Posted by ppslim — Tue Jul 23, 2002 4:41 am

]]> 2002-07-23T02:47:58-04:00 2002-07-23T02:47:58-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9090#p9090 <![CDATA[Re: What are your thoughts on us?]]>
I'm just trying to get a general census of where and how we're known around the net. Any kind of coments are more than welcomed.

Thanks.

Devon Dunham
Owner
Sharpnet Communications, Inc.
Do you support IPv4 to IRCNet?

Statistics: Posted by Bever — Tue Jul 23, 2002 2:47 am

]]> 2002-07-22T21:39:39-04:00 2002-07-22T21:39:39-04:00 https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=9088#p9088 <![CDATA[What are your thoughts on us?]]> devon, you know what i think.. sharpnet is an excellent shell provider :)

i think i've been with sharpnet 3 years now. my how time flies!
and its only gotten better and better since i've been a customer.
whenever someone asks for references for good shell providers, ive always included sharpnet in the list.

Statistics: Posted by Guest — Mon Jul 22, 2002 9:39 pm

]]>