egghelp/eggheads community

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-09-13T14:38:10-04:00

You've recived an answer on your other thread. Stick to one thread with the question on the same issue.

Statistics: Posted by caesar — Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:38 pm

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-09-13T05:40:36-04:00

Once again I need little more update in this, I did request in other post but got no response.

Script works almost charm except I want to add one more option to make it more secured.

I should deop the nick & release the banmask, if the ban mask matchs more than x number of users. Just to prevent masskick in channel.

Thx again in advance.

Statistics: Posted by i.m.offline — Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:40 am

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-03-04T21:57:16-04:00

Now it look most perfect. Thanks Alchera

Statistics: Posted by i.m.offline — Sat Mar 04, 2006 9:57 pm

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-03-04T10:11:08-04:00

Code:

if {![botisop $chan]} {return}

Add the above line before:

Code:

if {![string match ...

Statistics: Posted by Alchera — Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:11 am

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-03-04T07:59:53-04:00

Can I request for little more update in it, it should check for bans only if OPed in channel. because else its causing error. Thanks in advance.

Statistics: Posted by i.m.offline — Sat Mar 04, 2006 7:59 am

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-03-04T06:39:59-04:00

It works charm MeTroiD. Thanks a million .

Statistics: Posted by i.m.offline — Sat Mar 04, 2006 6:39 am

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-03-04T05:41:43-04:00

He checks banmasks, thus checks nicknamess too.

I've seen nicknames with [ in it.

Statistics: Posted by metroid — Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:41 am

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-03-04T03:28:03-04:00

I for one haven't seen a host that has a [ in it, have you?

Statistics: Posted by caesar — Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:28 am

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-03-03T15:50:40-04:00

No because string match does strange things with [ (i think \ too, not sure)

Try it yourself

Code:

% string match -nocase \[moo\] \[moo\]0% string match \[moo\] \[moo\]0% string match *\[mo\]* moo1%

This what i meant with string match acting like regexp

Statistics: Posted by metroid — Fri Mar 03, 2006 3:50 pm

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-03-03T14:54:28-04:00

what's with the "string map"? Only the 'string match -nocase' should do fine.

Statistics: Posted by caesar — Fri Mar 03, 2006 2:54 pm

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-03-03T12:14:33-04:00

Because string match is slightly gay, some banmasks would never match a user like that.

So we use a string map to get rid of \ and [ because string match will try to behave a little like regexp if you don't.

Code:

bind mode - "* +b" enforcebans  proc enforcebans {nick uhost hand chan mc ban} {  if {![string match -nocase [string map {"\\" "\\\\" "\[" "\\["} $ban] $::botname]} {    foreach n [chanlist $chan] {      if {[string match -nocase [string map {"\\" "\\\\" "\[" "\\["} $ban] $n![getchanhost $n $chan]]} {        putkick $chan $n "Banned: Enforcing ban set by $nick 14($ban)"       }     }   } else {    pushmode $chan -o $nick  }}

This is the best i'm willing to do, the bot will unban any masks that match his nick/host anyway.

Statistics: Posted by metroid — Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:14 pm

Some Addition for +enforcebans

2006-03-03T05:32:39-04:00

I have a code for enforce ban (I want to use this instead of +enforcebans, as I want to show own kick msg etc).
I would request if some one can make it little more protected, i.e. it shouldn't kick if the ban mask is *!*@* & if ban mask matches bot's nick. if banmask is set to *!*@* then bot shall remove the unban the mask & deop the Nick and if banmask matches to bots nick then just release the ban. Thanks in advance.

Code:

bind mode - "* +b" enforcebans   proc enforcebans {nick uhost hand chan mc ban} {   foreach n [chanlist $chan] {    if {[string match -nocase $ban $n![getchanhost $n $chan]]} {     putkick $chan $n "Banned: Enforcing ban set by $nick 14($ban)"    }   }  }

Statistics: Posted by i.m.offline — Fri Mar 03, 2006 5:32 am