<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/10595" />

	<title>egghelp/eggheads community</title>
	<subtitle>Discussion of eggdrop bots, shell accounts and tcl scripts.</subtitle>
	<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/index.php" />
	<updated>2005-10-01T18:05:18-04:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[egghelp/eggheads community]]></name></author>
	<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/10595</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Alchera]]></name></author>
		<updated>2005-10-01T18:05:18-04:00</updated>

		<published>2005-10-01T18:05:18-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56279#p56279</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56279#p56279"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[problem with join flood and netsplit]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56279#p56279"><![CDATA[
With cycber cafe's it's a problem as they all get banned (they're all clones) hence, bot's in cafe channels should  not check for flood-joins. Coming back from large splits, the bot sees it all as a mass join flood.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3646">Alchera</a> — Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:05 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[demond]]></name></author>
		<updated>2005-10-01T02:11:14-04:00</updated>

		<published>2005-10-01T02:11:14-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56254#p56254</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56254#p56254"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[problem with join flood and netsplit]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56254#p56254"><![CDATA[
<blockquote class="uncited"><div>Because of DALnet's oh so reliable Network (now there's a laugh) and almost hourly splits I've turned off flood join which gets around the whole problem:<br><div class="codebox"><p>Code: </p><pre><code>set global-flood-join 0:0</code></pre></div></div></blockquote>nah, that's irrelevant to splits, and to mass join flood too, since eggdrop would only track <strong class="text-strong">consecutive</strong> joins from <strong class="text-strong">the same</strong> hostname/ip<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=5056">demond</a> — Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:11 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[demond]]></name></author>
		<updated>2005-10-01T02:01:00-04:00</updated>

		<published>2005-10-01T02:01:00-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56253#p56253</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56253#p56253"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[problem with join flood and netsplit]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56253#p56253"><![CDATA[
<blockquote class="uncited"><div>the thing is that what if the protection bot was on the server that split.<br>and pple joined on the other linked servers. the bot will think there's a flood. so it's not rare specialy if the server took a more or less long time to rejoin.</div></blockquote>either way, the only way you can distinguish between join and rejoin is to set <em class="text-italics">wait-split</em> to some acceptable for your network value (default is 300 = 5mins)<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=5056">demond</a> — Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:01 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[SaPrOuZy]]></name></author>
		<updated>2005-10-01T01:48:22-04:00</updated>

		<published>2005-10-01T01:48:22-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56252#p56252</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56252#p56252"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[problem with join flood and netsplit]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56252#p56252"><![CDATA[
<blockquote class="uncited"><div>n the end, such scenario - people joining on the split, while not one of them has actually been seen by the bot splitting - is highly unlikely, hence no real need of recognizing it, it would happen very rarely</div></blockquote>the thing is that what if the protection bot was on the server that split.<br>and pple joined on the other linked servers. the bot will think there's a flood. so it's not rare specialy if the server took a more or less long time to rejoin.<br><blockquote class="uncited"><div>Because of DALnet's oh so reliable Network (now there's a laugh) and almost hourly splits I've turned off flood join which gets around the whole problem: <br><br>Code: <br>set global-flood-join 0:0 </div></blockquote>in that case no one would have bothered making join flood scripts <img class="smilies" src="https://forum.eggheads.org/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif" width="15" height="15" alt=":P" title="Razz"><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=4727">SaPrOuZy</a> — Sat Oct 01, 2005 1:48 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Alchera]]></name></author>
		<updated>2005-09-30T22:16:18-04:00</updated>

		<published>2005-09-30T22:16:18-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56247#p56247</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56247#p56247"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[problem with join flood and netsplit]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56247#p56247"><![CDATA[
Because of DALnet's oh so reliable Network (now there's a laugh) and almost hourly splits I've turned off flood join which gets around the whole problem:<br><div class="codebox"><p>Code: </p><pre><code>set global-flood-join 0:0</code></pre></div>Other methods for checking for (possible) spam bots need be used.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3646">Alchera</a> — Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:16 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[demond]]></name></author>
		<updated>2005-09-30T19:19:50-04:00</updated>

		<published>2005-09-30T19:19:50-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56241#p56241</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56241#p56241"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[problem with join flood and netsplit]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56241#p56241"><![CDATA[
there is no way to know if joining clients - that the bot has no record of being on channel previously, therefore [bind rejn] is irrelevant - are legitimate people who have joined on the split, or drones that are join-flooding<br><br>i.e. you can't know which of the 2 possible scenarios is happening, unless you know for sure the network is rejoining; and you generally can't know if the network is rejoining - well, maybe you can in some cases - when you see a server mode<br><br>of course, all of that is valid on the presumption that [bind rejn] is not triggered, i.e. there hasn't been one client that has splitted<br><br>in the end, such scenario - people joining on the split, while not one of them has actually been seen by the bot splitting - is highly unlikely, hence no real need of recognizing it, it would happen very rarely<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=5056">demond</a> — Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:19 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Sir_Fz]]></name></author>
		<updated>2005-09-30T18:23:15-04:00</updated>

		<published>2005-09-30T18:23:15-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56240#p56240</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56240#p56240"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[problem with join flood and netsplit]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56240#p56240"><![CDATA[
I think that the rejn bind depends on the wait-netsplit setting (correct me if I'm wrong) so IMO the best solution to this is to increase the wait-netsplit time (thus the rejoins will not trigger join binds).<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3085">Sir_Fz</a> — Fri Sep 30, 2005 6:23 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[SaPrOuZy]]></name></author>
		<updated>2005-09-30T16:12:16-04:00</updated>

		<published>2005-09-30T16:12:16-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56235#p56235</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56235#p56235"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[problem with join flood and netsplit]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=56235#p56235"><![CDATA[
hey there,<br>for the guys that have done mass join protection scripts,<br>how do you know that the users that join a split server, <br>aren't a mass join when the server returns.<br>am facing this prob:<br><blockquote class="uncited"><div>-----------------------------------------------------------<br>[22:03] Netsplit detected at brain.hub.eu.dal.net (CtrlF3 to see who split)   &lt;------- Dilemma was split<br>[22:04] »»» Joins: male-33 (~male-33@217.194.155.27)<br>[22:05] »»» Joins: lonly_man (~disperado@202.148.15.34)<br>[22:08] »»» Joins: M-35-LEB (~M-35-LEB@195.69.208.20)<br>[22:09] »»» Joins: imissu_19_m (~2hlean@62.84.75.150)<br>[22:10] »»» Joins: Realise (~Realise_@82.214.211.1)<br>[22:12] »»» Joins: small-bird (~small-bir@82.146.165.58)<br>[22:12] »»» Joins: msn-man (love@212.36.207.255)<br>---------------------------------------------------------- (the server rejoins here)<br>[22:13] »»» Joins: Dilemma (<a href="mailto:sin@alert.codered.cx">sin@alert.codered.cx</a>)<br>[22:13] »»» Joins: Euphoria (<a href="mailto:misery@stupid.lackies.com">misery@stupid.lackies.com</a>)<br>[22:13] »»» Joins: paloma2010 (<a href="mailto:paloma2010@ppp-128-101.terra.net.lb">paloma2010@ppp-128-101.terra.net.lb</a>)<br>[22:13] »»» Joins: Acx (<a href="mailto:angelz@uses.encrypted.botpack.biz">angelz@uses.encrypted.botpack.biz</a>)<br>[22:13] »»» Joins: lebanonlady (~.....@62.84.77.61)<br>[22:13] »»» Joins: Atlantica (blue@64.124.16.54)<br>[22:13] »»» Joins: Xandra (<a href="mailto:angelz@exploited.ssh.and.hack3d.us">angelz@exploited.ssh.and.hack3d.us</a>)<br>[22:13] »»» Mode (brain.hub.eu.dal.net:#Beirut +ooo Dilemma Atlantica Xandra)<br>[22:13] »»» Mode (Dilemma:#Beirut +RM-k [Flood.Stopped])<br>[22:13] »»» Mode (Dilemma:#Beirut +bbbbb *!*@212.36.207.255 *!*@82.146.165.58 *!*@82.214.211.1 *!*@62.84.75.150 *!*@195.69.208.20)<br>»»» [Banned]: msn-man<br>»»» [Banned]: small-bird<br>»»» [Banned]: Realise<br>»»» [Banned]: imissu_19_m<br>»»» [Banned]: M-35-LEB<br>[22:13] »»» Mode (Dilemma:#Beirut +b *!*@202.148.15.34)<br>»»» [Banned]: lonly_man<br>[22:13] »»» Mode (Dilemma:#Beirut +b *!*@217.194.155.27)<br>»»» [Banned]: male-33</div></blockquote>so the people that joined after the bot split trigered the flood prot when the server rejoined<br><br>how can this be taken care of?<br><br>one of the solutions that i did but i prefer not to use, is to bind rejn to a proc that will stop the protection for a little while (5 secs) but the risk would still be there (if the fisrt 5 rejoiners weren't seen as splited nicks)<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=4727">SaPrOuZy</a> — Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:12 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
