<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/1018" />

	<title>egghelp/eggheads community</title>
	<subtitle>Discussion of eggdrop bots, shell accounts and tcl scripts.</subtitle>
	<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/index.php" />
	<updated>2002-02-12T22:27:00-04:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[egghelp/eggheads community]]></name></author>
	<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/app.php/feed/topic/1018</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></name></author>
		<updated>2002-02-12T22:27:00-04:00</updated>

		<published>2002-02-12T22:27:00-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4515#p4515</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4515#p4515"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[rebind .+/-ban]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4515#p4515"><![CDATA[
<blockquote class="uncited"><div>On 2002-02-11 20:12, Wcc wrote:<br>code:</div></blockquote>Thanks, that was exactly what I was looking for <img class="smilies" src="https://forum.eggheads.org/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" width="15" height="15" alt=":smile:" title="Smile"><br><br>(Sorry for this useless, but significant post)<p>Statistics: Posted by Guest — Tue Feb 12, 2002 10:27 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Wcc]]></name></author>
		<updated>2002-02-11T23:12:00-04:00</updated>

		<published>2002-02-11T23:12:00-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4483#p4483</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4483#p4483"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[rebind .+/-ban]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4483#p4483"><![CDATA[
<div class="codebox"><p>Code: </p><pre><code>unbind dcc o|o -ban *dcc:-banunbind dcc o|o +ban *dcc:+banbind dcc o|m -ban *dcc:-banbind dcc o|m +ban *dcc:+ban</code></pre></div><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=270">Wcc</a> — Mon Feb 11, 2002 11:12 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></name></author>
		<updated>2002-02-10T18:32:00-04:00</updated>

		<published>2002-02-10T18:32:00-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4456#p4456</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4456#p4456"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[rebind .+/-ban]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4456#p4456"><![CDATA[
<blockquote class="uncited"><div>On 2002-02-10 11:02, Petersen wrote:<br>why give someone a |o flag for #yourbigchannel if you can't trust them with .-ban?</div></blockquote>The botnet is really restricted on partyline access: only "key" users have access: bot/channel owners/masters, and that's it. The "big boss" of #mybigchannel doesn't want the bans to be lifted by regular ops. if regular ops want to add a temporary/permanent ban in the bot, they have to ask, for the simple reason: In any situation, people can't all agree. And the more people have access to the bots to change things, the more insecure the channel can be.<br><br>Blocking normal ops access to the bot is a solution, but I don't want to punish the  owner of #mysmallchannel because of #mybigchannel's wishes. When the bee queen says so...<p>Statistics: Posted by Guest — Sun Feb 10, 2002 6:32 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Petersen]]></name></author>
		<updated>2002-02-10T14:02:00-04:00</updated>

		<published>2002-02-10T14:02:00-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4451#p4451</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4451#p4451"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[rebind .+/-ban]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4451#p4451"><![CDATA[
why give someone a |o flag for #yourbigchannel if you can't trust them with .-ban?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forum.eggheads.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=60">Petersen</a> — Sun Feb 10, 2002 2:02 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></name></author>
		<updated>2002-02-10T00:53:00-04:00</updated>

		<published>2002-02-10T00:53:00-04:00</published>
		<id>https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4434#p4434</id>
		<link href="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4434#p4434"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[rebind .+/-ban]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forum.eggheads.org/viewtopic.php?p=4434#p4434"><![CDATA[
I want to rebind the .+ban and .-ban commands to that only fmno|mn can use the command (normal channel ops can't lift bans).<br><br>In a context, this is to prevent the channel owner and masters of #mysmallchannel from removing bans from #mybigchannel, but still being able to manage bans from his channel.<br><br>My global operators are trustful enough, otherwise they wouldn't have a global +o in the first place.<p>Statistics: Posted by Guest — Sun Feb 10, 2002 12:53 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
