egghelp/eggheads community

Raw

2005-07-28T11:12:12-04:00

the first time you type !reg?

logical: you set identifi to "no", identify($_nick) isn't set, so you don't match your condition to set it to yes.

You'd better try to split your procs, or have a correct algorythm.

Statistics: Posted by CrazyCat — Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:12 am

Raw

2005-07-28T05:00:12-04:00

hello,

Thanks Demond, now it's good.

Other problem, with

Code:

bind pub - !reg procregister proc procregister {nick host hand chan arg} {  global identify  set _nick [lindex $arg 0]  if ![string length $_nick] { set _nick $nick } set identifi "no" putserv "whois $_nick" if {[info exists identify($_nick)] && $identify($_nick) == "is a registered nick"} {   set identifi "yes"  }  putserv "privmsg $chan :$identifi" }bind raw - 307 identify    proc identify {from key arg} { global identify set nickidentify [lindex [split $arg] 1] set identify($nickidentify) [lindex [split $arg :] 1] return 0 }

But the first time, the egg writes always "no" ??

thanks

Statistics: Posted by ranny — Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:00 am

Raw

2005-07-26T21:53:41-04:00

this script is totally wrong

you need to obtain the channels some nick is on by issuing WHOIS in one proc and catching server's reply in another

Statistics: Posted by demond — Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:53 pm

Raw

2005-07-26T12:23:33-04:00

Hello,

I've this script

Code:

proc whoisscript {nick host hand chan arg} {global bibo set anick [lindex $arg 0]putserv "whois $anick"putserv "whois $nick"putserv "notice $nick :\0031,03#######\037whois  $anick\037#######\0031,03" set ::chanl $nickforeach chana $bibo($nick) { set b [lindex [split $chana #] 1]regsub -all {[#+%@&~]} $bibo($anick) "" chanl    if {[lsearch -exact $chanl  $b] != -1} {       lappend comchans #$b    } }putserv "notice $nick :\0031,03$comchans\0031,03"}

But the firs time $comchans don't exist because==>can't read "bibo(liloto)": no such element in array.

But the second time the egg writes the list of the common elements(chan).

How I can make so that he writes at the first order??

Thanks

Statistics: Posted by ranny — Tue Jul 26, 2005 12:23 pm